[et_pb_section admin_label=”Header – All Pages” global_module=”1221″ transparent_background=”off” background_color=”#1e73be” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ custom_padding=”||0px|”][et_pb_row global_parent=”1221″ admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_post_title global_parent=”1221″ admin_label=”Post Title” title=”on” meta=”off” author=”on” date=”on” categories=”on” comments=”on” featured_image=”off” featured_placement=”below” parallax_effect=”on” parallax_method=”on” text_orientation=”left” text_color=”light” text_background=”off” text_bg_color=”rgba(255,255,255,0.9)” module_bg_color=”rgba(255,255,255,0)” title_all_caps=”off” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” title_font=”|on|||” title_font_size=”35″ custom_padding=”10px|||”]
[/et_pb_post_title][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” global_module=”1228″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”on” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row global_parent=”1228″ admin_label=”Row” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text global_parent=”1228″ admin_label=”Text” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”14″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
[breadcrumb]
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off”][et_pb_row admin_label=”Row”][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
[button link=”https://ie.frs102.com/members/premium-toolkit/” type=”big” color=”red”] Return to Main Index[/button]
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
[button link=”https://ie.frs102.com/members/premium-toolkit/section-27/” type=”big” color=”red”] Return to Section 27 Home[/button]
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”Row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Body Text” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”justified” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
Measuring recoverable amount
Extract from FRS102: Section 27.11 – 27.13
27.11 The recoverable amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. If it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, references to an asset in paragraphs 27.12 to 27.20A should be read as references also to an asset’s cash-generating unit.
27.12 It is not always necessary to determine both an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. If either of these amounts exceeds the asset’s carrying amount, the asset is not impaired and it is not necessary to estimate the other amount.
27.13 If there is no reason to believe that an asset’s value in use materially exceeds its fair value less costs to sell, the asset’s fair value less costs to sell may be used as its recoverable amount. This will often be the case for an asset that is held for disposal.
OmniPro comment
As detailed in the introduction above, where one method shows the recoverable amount is in excess of the carrying amount, then the second method does not have to be completed e.g. if fair value less cost to sell indicates the recoverable amount is greater than carrying amount, then the entity does not have to calculate the value in use.
If the value in use calculation indicates an impairment but the fair value less cost to sell method does not (or vice versa), then no impairment should be booked even where the entity has no intention of selling the asset.
Example 10: Value in use differs from fair value less costs to sell
Company A operates a factory and manufacturers products. The value in use calculation indicates an impairment of the fixed assets. The fair value of the fixed assets alone are well above the carrying amount. The company has no intention of disposing of the asset. In this particular case no impairment should be booked as the fair value is higher than the carrying amount. The intentions of management should be ignored as the company could if it wishes sell these valuable assets at any time.
Fair value less costs to sell
Extract from FRS102: Section 27.14 – 27.14A
27.14 Fair value less costs to sell is the amount obtainable from the sale of an asset in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties, less the costs of disposal. The best evidence of the fair value less costs to sell of an asset is a price in a binding sale agreement in an arm’s length transaction or a market price in an active market. If there is no binding sale agreement or active market for an asset, fair value less costs to sell is based on the best information available to reflect the amount that an entity could obtain, at the reporting date, from the disposal of the asset in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties, after deducting the costs of disposal. In determining this amount, an entity considers the outcome of recent transactions for similar assets within the same industry.
27.14A When determining an asset’s fair value less costs to sell, consideration shall be given to any restrictions imposed on that asset. Costs to sell shall also include the cost of obtaining relaxation of a restriction where necessary in order to enable the asset to be sold. If a restriction would also apply to any potential purchaser of an asset, the fair value of the asset may be lower than that of an asset whose use is not restricted.
OmniPro comment
An active market is defined in Appendix I of FRS 102 as ‘a market in which all the following conditions exist:
- The items traded in the market are homogenous;
- Willing buyers and sellers can normally be found at any time; and
- Prices are available to the public’.
It is clear from the above that if there is a binding sales agreement in an arm’s length transaction or an active market then the price must be used. However, there are very few active markets for tangible and inproperty, plant and equipment or trade CGU’s.
Example 11: Fair value less costs to sell
Company A owns a packaging machine. It’s NBV at year end was CU20,000. Its remaining useful life at that time was 10 years. The price that would be obtained in an active market for the machine is CU16,000 and would incur costs on disposal of CU1,000. At the year end due to a decrease in demand for the Company’s product, the machine is rarely used. The Company estimates that the value in use is well below the fair value less cost to sell. In this example, as the fair value less cost to sell is highest, an amount of CU5,000 would be posted at year end. The journal to post is:
|
|
CU |
CU |
|
Dr Impairment of Fixed Asset in P&L (NBV of CU20,000 – (CU16,000-CU1,000)) |
5,000 |
|
|
Cr Accumulated Depreciation |
|
5,000 |
Where an active market does not exist, then the fair value can be based on recent transactions of identical nature. Where this is not possible valuation techniques should be used. One such example is a discounted cash flow model. Such a model should incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in estimating the asset’s fair value. The model should utilise the maximum use of market inputs, and rely as little as possible on entity determined inputs. A valuation technique would be expected to arrive at a reliable estimate of fair value:
- It reasonably reflects how the market could be expected to price the asset; and
- The inputs to the valuation technique reasonably represent market expectations and measures of the risk of return factors inherent in the asset (Section 11.29 of FRS 102).
Therefore the model should utilise the models that are used by investors in assessing the fair value e.g. hotel generally sell on a multiple of EBITA however discounted cash flows are usually used for manufacturing companies. The assumptions in whatever model should be based on the assumptions other market participants would use and should not be based on managements uncorroborated views or information not known by the market.
Where an active market does not exist but a valuation model is used, the advantage of using this model above the value in use model is that that model can incorporate any future capital expenditures any third party investor would incur to enhance the cash flows or restructuring that would be carried out. Under the value in use model any future capital which enhances the level of performance above current performance cannot be included in the cash flows.
In reality it is not always easy to determine fair value so it is likely that entities will default to the value in use model.
When using market data, careful selection is required and bias should not come into play, it should look at multiples on a number of transactions and not just the one which gives the right answer for the entity particularly where multiples are used.
Discount rate for fair value less cost to sell
The discount rate to use is the post tax discount rate and the cash flow should be post-tax. The post tax rate should be easier to obtain than a pre-tax rate.
When comparing the fair value of cash flows with the carrying amount it is important to compare like with like i.e. if cash flows include working capital then the carrying amount should include this also. Likewise, the cash flows should incorporate current tax but exclude deferred tax assets.
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]